Bondage to Doctrinal Purity

One of the bondages Jesus came to set us free from was bondage to a legalistic, weaponized use of the Law of Moses. He hung out with those deemed undesirable by religious folks, especially religious leaders who used the Law as a means of excluding people. In opposition to the Laws of Moses he healed on the Sabbath, touched lepers, worked on the Sabbath, shared God’s love with a Samaritan woman, healed a Roman officer’s young manslave, “pais,” (probably meant in the common context of male lover), included eunuchs (sexually other) in the kingdom of God, and showed a profound interest in the spirituality of women. His sermon on the mount, and “you have heard it said, but I say unto you,” shows a midrash style of reinterpretation at odds with the Saducees and Pharisees.

So here’s the problem I see, and the recent flack over Andy Stanley’s series on the OT is a good example, when Christians try to make Christianity about following rules, you don’t end up with more loving Christians, just legalistic ones. Take male headship for example. Instead of seeing the Pauline example to be taken from Christ’s self-sacrificing servant attitude, men only see “rulership” over women. One can read that into the narrative, but only by ignoring Christ’s example. When you do so, the SBC and Paige Patterson is what you get.

Evangelicalism has always tended to get lost in the weeds. Rather than seeing the overarching trajectory of scripture as pointing to Jesus and his twofold commandment, they heap on as many laws as possible, not trusting the work of the Holy Spirit. It becomes more about excluding others than letting others in. Christians become defined by who they are not, rather than who they should be emulating. It reduces Christianity to a scorecard, with their particular statement of faith as the standard by which to score others.

Currently the UMC, United Methodist Church, is struggling over what type of Jesus and what type of Gospel they wish to represent. Things do not look good for the health of the denomination. A rather large faction within the church wishes to return to the good old days when Gays were excluded. When the law of love is supplanted by an obsession with doctrinal purity, everyone loses. How many more denominations and church splits do we need before we realize this?

One thought on “Bondage to Doctrinal Purity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s